What's All people having very good accuracy with for 180gr products and 4831? Just in search of a starting point so I don't waste lots of elements. Many thanks for the help!

H4831 will work while in the Swift although not genuine very well. You'll never obtain the pressures you'll need for regularity Together with the .223. 760, or H414 will be far better but for some cause I ain't the most important fan of most ball powders.

The truth that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is specifically why you're looking at better velocities attained with that powder, instead of Everything you've observed While using the IMR things. Also very good powder, but rather far better suited to a little bit lesser scenarios having a little bit significantly less potential.

That means the knowledgable handloader can, with a few extrapolation, locate a starting off load when just one is detailed for a particular cartridge.

The only real distinction as I know it is that the SC was built to get the job done through powder measures greater (which it does). The longer grains usually do not feed very well at all in some steps. Thats my 02 :grin:

Apache Jct Superior facts, I've jars of both of those and normally puzzled if they may be reloaded While using the exact same recipes must I operate out of one or another.

I have made use of each and utilised the very same rates and also have not been capable to convey to any noticable differences with overall performance. the SC Edition meters somewhat smoother is about all. any reviews??

Like said earlier mentioned, identical things. All of that differs is the dimensions of the h4831sc kernels. I did listen to somewhere that they're going to only make the SC Sooner or later. I do not know if that is definitely correct or not but would sound right to me. I use SC mainly because that's what I located in the 8 lb jug and it really works.

With the smoother move properties will come more uniform demand weights, when the individual grains orient much more compactly, making better loading density.

Ballistically, this Serious Extruded powder is the precise copy of H4831. Bodily, it's got a shorter grain dimension, hence, the designation SC or quick Slice. The shorter, h4831sc load data much more compact kernels enable the powder to movement from the powder steps a lot more effortlessly, assisting to ease the continuous slicing of granules.

As for that 4831 vs 4831SC, h4831sc load data They're the same/similar powder cept for grain dimension. Load data is interchangeable.

The "SC" means Shorter Lower. I haven't noticed a difference between either powder dut I do not Assume I might mix them.

I normally generally have the sc Variation. Employing a powder evaluate it hangs up a lot less because of shorter kernels and I believe enables a lot more steady metering so significantly less time you take trickling in the last little bit of cost to generate fat. So generally the SC saves you occasions

The fact that the H4831 is in truth a slower burning powder is exactly why you're looking at better velocities attained with that powder, rather than Everything you've found Along with the IMR stuff.